Makerbot Vs. Dimension SST 1200es

The Industrial Design department at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia (of which I am a part) just moved to a new building with brand new facilities, including a new shop. I guess it was time for an upgrade because almost every tool in the shop is brand new and we now have a Universal Laser Systems laser cutter (new favorite) and a Dimension SST 1200es 3D printer.

This particular Dimension printer happens to utilize fused deposition modeling and it prints with ABS plastic… So of course, having recently completed my Makerbot, I had to do a little comparison. I printed two objects (both of which can be found on; a stormtrooper head and a dodecahedron. One thing to keep in mind when reading this is that my particular Makerbot is not up to the highest printing quality yet, so there is definitely room for improvement. First, the prints (click pictures for ultra large versions):

Obviously the Dimension wins this round. Printing at 0.245mm (0.01 inches) per layer, it trumped my 0.35mm per layer Makerbot prints. The XY resolution is definitely higher on the Dimension, and the plastic extrusion in general is more controlled and precise. If you are looking for tolerances rivaling what the human eye can perceive, the Dimension is what you are looking to print with.

The big difference is that the Dimension prints support material in addition to the ABS plastic. This means that crazy overhangs, objects within objects, etc. can be achieved. (The folks at Makerbot designed their printer to be compatible with multiple print heads, so some time in the future the Makerbot will be printing support material too)

The stormtrooper and the dodecahedron were printed at the same time in the Dimension; they took roughly 1 hour and 40 minutes to complete. The Makerbot had the stormtrooper done in 25 minutes and the dodecahedron done in about 16. Add an extra 5 minutes or so for setup between prints (which is a pretty conservative estimate) and you’re still talking less than half the print time (~46 minutes).

But wait! The Dimension prints support material as well, so the storm trooper and dodecahedron must go in a vat of solution for an additional hour. Bringing the print times to:
Dimension – 2 hours 40 minutes (assuming you didn’t have to wait for the solution to get up to 150 degrees and you grabbed the prints out of the printer as SOON as they were done– an idealized situation).
Makerbot – 46 minutes.

Those of you familiar with the Makerbot know how many settings there are to tweak just to get the bot to print something decently coherent. Skeinforge is not the user-friendliest software package ever made, and it takes some getting used to. The Dimension comes ready to party and, spare a few simplified parameters you might need to change, you can hit ‘Open File’, select your file, and hit ‘Print’.

The physical preparation is similar for both; the Dimension has a plastic tray you must snap into place, while the Makerbot has a build platform you must snap into place.

The Dimension is the easier of the two to use, however…

After learning the ins and outs of the Makerbot, I was taught how to print something on the Dimension. There is a drop-down menu for the density of the object you are printing; the options are something like ‘Sparse’, ‘Dense’, ‘Minimum’, and ‘Maximum’. To which I replied: you can’t even set the object density as a percentage from 0-100?

The Makerbot lets you tweak EVERY little detail, while the Dimension gives you almost no options. You don’t even have the ability to turn the support material off!

Things you might not realize can be tweaked on the Makerbot: layer thickness (.01 inches and .013 inches are your only options on the Dimension), feedrate (speed), flowrate (extruder speed), object density, wall thickness…


Dimension SST 1200es: ~$30,000 (for just the printer, excluding plastic, support material, and build trays)
Makerbot: $750
Dimension obviously capitalizes on every opportunity to charge money; the plastic (which is almost identical to that used in the Makerbot) as well as the support material is housed inside a case that slides into a slot on the printer. Though I don’t know the price of a case off the top of my head, I know that it works out to about $5 for every cubic inch of plastic. A 5lb reel of ABS plastic for the Makerbot costs $50 or $60 (depending on the color)  and will last you at LEAST a few months of printing regularly.

Do keep in mind that you are paying $30,000 for the ability to hit the ‘Print’ button and walk away. This is crucial in many work environments (because it eliminates the need for a dedicated staff of technicians, which some printing technologies require).


Speed wins out over quality most of the time when designing things. 0.35mm per layer means that you can see how an object feels in your hand; ultra fine detail is not always necessary. 46 minutes versus 2 hours and 40 minutes is a HUGE difference!

The Dimension would be clutch in the engineering field because of the tolerances necessary, but as far as designing goes… I’ll take my $29,250 and sacrifice a few fractions of a millimeter.

No offense to Dimension, though. You make nice printers.


4 Responses to “Makerbot Vs. Dimension SST 1200es”

  1. Charles Edward Pax Says:

    I’d like to know what material the SST uses as the support material. Would you be able to tell me or point me in the right direction?

  2. kylestetzrp Says:

    as a matter of fact it is not easy to find that information by just googling around… have you tried emailing them? it seems like the kind of information they won’t just dish out to anyone, but it is worth a shot. if you do, let me know what they say and i will update this post. they are pretty good about replying to email (it may help if you say that you are with an institution or company interested in investing in the technology. that’s what i did).

  3. Mike Says:

    How long did it take you to make the Makerbot? I see that the output of the makerbot is not very exact, is there alot of tweaking that needs to be done on each object printed? Or is it that you get it right once and it stays accurate? If you sanded the plastic a bit would it be a pretty good 3D model, ie would you offer this service to a client looking for rapid prototyping?

    • kylestetzrp Says:

      It took me a month to make the Makerbot, however I had to solder all of the electronics together (they come pre-soldered now). It takes a lot of tweaking but the output can be optimized. Theoretically every print should come out good if the settings have been optimized for your printer.

      It could definitely be used in a rapid prototyping service, but the Makerbot doesn’t print support material yet so model detail is definitely limited (i.e. no crazy overhangs or objects within objects). I guess it would depend on your clients and the nature of their models.

      Hope this answers your questions!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: